Headquarter: Chemical Industry Park, Economic Development Zone,  JiNan City,  ShanDong Province, China.

Phone +86-152 8958 7728


Fast response and recovery polyaniline montmorillonite reduce … – Nature.com

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Scientific Reports volume 13, Article number: 8074 (2023)
1153 Accesses
1 Altmetric
Metrics details
In the present work, we have developed a polymer based gas sensor. The polymer nanocomposites are synthesized by the chemical oxidative polymerization of aniline with ammonium persulfate and sulfuric acid. The fabricated sensor is able to achieve a sensing response of 4.56% for PANI/MMT-rGO at 2 ppm of hydrogen cyanide (HCN) gas. The sensitivity of the sensors PANI/MMT and PANI/MMT-rGO are 0.89 ppm−1 and 1.1174 ppm−1 respectively. The increase in the sensitivity of the sensor may be due to an increase in the surface area provided by MMT and rGO which provided more binding sites for the HCN gas. The sensing response of the sensor increases as the concentration of the gas exposed increases but saturates after 10 ppm. The sensor recovers automatically. The sensor is stable and can work for 8 months.
Hydrogen Cyanide (HCN) vapour is extremely hazardous to the living organism. HCN gas when inhaled it increases the intake level of oxygen by the cell1,2,3. The toxic level of the HCN gas is above 100 ppm and when exposed can kill a human being within 1 h4. Bhopal gas tragedy in 1984 killed 3,787 innocent people in a single night. This tragedy could have been prevented if some warning alarm system (gas sensor) is installed. The detection of trace amounts of toxic gasses (ammonia, dimethyl methyl phosphonate (DMMP), carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, HCN) is important to prevent a fatal accident. Thus fabrication and development of electronic noses at the micro-and nano-level are needed. Fabrication of gas sensors using nanostructures increases the sensitivity of the sensors. The increase in surface area due to nanoparticles increases the binding sites of the gas. A sensor is a device when receives a stimulus it responds with an electrical signal5,6,7,8,9,10. Chemiresistance sensors work on the principle of change in resistance on exposure of gas. A standard sensor should satisfy the following characteristic features such as operation at room temperature, working in the ambient environment and no requirement of oxygen or air supply, no external stimulus is required, capacity to detect toxic gases at low concentration, high sensitivity and reproducibility, quick response and recovery, low cost and eco-friendly11.
Conducting polymer-based gas sensors has numerous advantages over the metal oxide sensors such as high sensitivity, short response time, operation at room temperature and can be tuned by the nature of the dopant. The sensitivity of the polymer base gas sensor is high due to the large surface-to-volume ratio, compact in size, lightweight and easy to integrate with existing electronic system12. Many researchers around the globe pay attention to the polymer nanocomposite material (organic–inorganic) due to their unique property such as increases flexibility, improved surface hardness and heat resistance (due to inorganic components)8,9,10,13,14,15. Yang et al.16 have reported the detection of HCN gas by quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) technique16,17.
Here we are reporting for the first time the detection of HCN gas by chemi-resistance method having fast response. In the present work, we have synthesized the Polyaniline/MMT-rGO nanocomposite by chemical oxidative polymerization. We used PANI as a sensing material in this study because of its stability, high sensitivity, good electrical conductivity, low cost, and ease of synthesis in the lab. rGO provides more binding sites due to its high surface area, thermal stability, and electrical conductivity. Montmorillonite (MMT) is used as a sensing material in the present study due to its high surface area, porous structure (which provides the large surface area), high adsorption coefficient, ease of tunable property (functionalization), environmental friendliness, and low cost. The synthesized polymer nanocomposite material is characterized by SEM, FTIR, and XRD. We can achieve a sensing response of 4.56% for PANI/MMT-rGO at 2 ppm of hydrogen cyanide (HCN) gas. The sensor recovers back to the baseline after every exposure of HCN. The sensor is stable and is working for the past 9 months successfully.
Aniline (C6H5NH2), sulphuric acid (H2SO4), hydrochloric acid (HCl), ammonium per sulphate ((NH4)2S2O8), potassium permanganate (KMnO4), sodium nitride (Na3N), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and hydrazine hydrate (H6N2O) are purchased from the Himedia. Ammonia (99.98%), acetone (99.9%), xylene (99%), benzene (99.9%), graphite and Montmorillonite (MMT) (CAS Number 1318-93-0) are obtained from Sigma Aldrich.
Graphene oxide (GO) was synthesized from graphite powder (Sigma-Aldrich) by using modified Hummers Method and further reduced by hydrazine hydrate to form reduced graphene oxide (rGO)18,19,20. Synthesized rGO is filtered by using Whatmann filter (125 micron), washed with deionized (DI) water, methanol and dried under vacuum.
0.5 M of aniline is added to distilled water of 50 ml and stirrered for 30 min. 0.5 m of H2SO4 is added to the above solution and stirrered for another 30 min. The functionalized MMT (0.5 g), 0.5 g of rGO are added and sonicated. Pre cooled solution of 0.5 M APS is added drop wise and kept for polymerization (8 h) below the 10 °C. The final nanocomposite is filtered using the Whatman filter paper (125 μm) and washed several times. Finally, the composite is washed with 10% of methanol to remove the unreactive chemical present in the composite. The polymer nanocomposite is dried at 60 °C. The PANI/MMT polymer nanocomposite material is prepared without adding rGO21,22,23 in the above process.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern is recorded on Rikagu (Model no Mini Flex 600) diffractometer using Cu-Kα1 radiation with a wavelength 1.5406 Å in continuous scan mode at an acceleration voltage of 40 kV and current of 40 mA. To study the bonding nature in the polymer nanocomposite Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra is recorded (Ferkin Elmer Modal no. 105627 FT-IR). The surface morphology of flexible nanocomposite sensor film is analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Transmission electron microscope (TEM) image is taken using TEM Jeol microscope operating at accelerating voltage of 120 keV.
Thin films of polymer nanocomposite is deposited over the flexible transparency sheet (25 mm × 0.5 mm) by a drop-cast method and dried at 45 °C. Silver (Ag) paste is used to make electrodes for electrical measurements. The optical photographs of sensors flexibility is shown in Fig. 1a,b. The sensing activity of the sensor is conducted at simple home-made gas chamber of net volume 1 L. Different concentrations of HCN gas are introduced inside the chamber. The schematic diagram of the gas sensing assembly is shown in Fig. 1c.
(a) Sensor (b) Showing the flexibility of the sensor, (c) gas sensor set up.
Chemiresistance technique is used for the detection of HCN gas. The dynamic resistance of the sensor is measured when the sensor is exposed to HCN using an LCR meter (Hioki 3232) which gives final resistance and without HCN gives initial resistance. The sensing chamber is flushed with nitrogen gas before and after measurements.
The desired concentrations of gas are generated by static liquid distribution method24,25.
where, C (ppm) is the desired target gas concentration, ρ is (g/mL) the density of the liquid (gas), V′ is the volume of liquid (μL), T temperature in Kelvin, M molecular weight of liquid (g/mol), and V volume of the chamber (L). Particular volume (μL) of analyte is injected into a chamber via a precision syringe. The gas chamber is flushed with the nitrogen (1000 sccm) gas before and after taking the reading. The sensor response, R%, is defined by26.
where, Ri is the initial resistance of the sensor, and Rf is the final resistance after exposure of HCN.
The sensitivity (S) of a sensor is defined by the slope of the graph drawn between sensing response versus concentration of the target gas:
Here ∆R and ∆C are changes in sensor response and concentration of gas.
The graph of the FTIR studies of the GO, rGO, PANI, PANI-MMT and PANI/MMT-rGO is shown in Fig. 2a,b. The peaks of the FTIR studies are shown in Table 1. The characteristics peaks at 3398 cm−1, 1225 cm−1, 1054 cm−1, 1632 cm−1 correspond to O–H, C–OH, C–O and C=C stretching vibration of the rGO20. The characteristics peaks at 1112.12 cm−1 and 1088 cm−1 are due to C–H plane bending vibration. The peaks at 1306.15 cm−1 is due to C=N stretching mode, 1486.20 cm−1 and 1483.31 cm−1 peaks correspond to C=C stretching in the benzenoid ring and 1576 cm−1 is due to C=C stretching of quinoid in PANI23,26,27. The characteristics peaks at 1126 cm−1 and 1042 cm−1 are due to Si–O stretching, 917 cm−1 and 799 cm−1 are due to Al–OH stretching and 525 cm−1 and 465 cm−1 are due to Si–O bending vibration of the.
(a,b) FTIR of polymer composite and rGO, (c,d) XRD pattern of GO and polymer nanocomposite.
MMT in composite28. The individual peaks of rGO, PANI and MMT are present in the PANI/MMT-rGO nanocomposite.
The XRD pattern of the rGO, PANI/MMT and PANI/MMT-rGO are shown in Fig. 2c,d. The peak at 2θ = 11.24° corresponds to the (001) plane of GO having an interlayer spacing of 0.77 nm, due to interlamellar groups trapped between hydrophilic graphene oxide sheets. The low-intensity peak at 2θ = 43.27° having (100) plane is due to rGO, thus confirming a random packing of graphene sheets in rGO29,30,31. The planes correspond to (001), (100), (005), (110) and (300) in the PANI/MMT are due to the MMT30,31,32. The plane (001) present at 15.5° in PANI/MMT-rGO composite is due to rGO. The individual peaks for rGO and MMT are found in the PANI/MMT-rGO polymer nanocomposite.
The TEM micrograph of the rGO reveals the formation of a single layer sheet structure as shown in Fig. 3a. PANI has tube-like structures as seen in SEM of micrograph in Fig. 3b. The average length and diameter of the PANI are found to be 250 nm and 50 nm respectively. Figure 3c,d show the SEM micrograph of PANI/MMT. Here the PANI is deposited over the surface of the MMT. Thus it increases the surface area of the PANI. Figure 3e–g show.
TEM image of (a) rGO, SEM images of (b) PANI, (c,d) PANI/MMT and (eg) PANI/MMT-rGO.
The SEM micrographs of PANI/MMT-rGO at different resolutions. The SEM micrograph shows that the PANI is encapsulating over the rGO sheets and also deposited over the surface of MMT.
The gas sensing study is carried out on the homemade chamber (1 L). 2 ppm concentration of different gases such as acetone, ammonia, benzene, hydrogen cyanide and xylene are introduced in the gas chamber containing the PANI/MMT gas sensor for the selectivity of the gas. The sensor is found to be more active to HCN having the sensing response of 3.5% as compared to the other gases as shown in Fig. 4a. Similarly, PANI/MMT-rGO sensor is exposed to different gases. Here we have found that the sensing response of the PANI/MMT-rGO toward the HCN is 4.56% as compared to other gases as shown in Fig. 4b. Thus both sensors have a good response toward the HCN gas.
(a) PANI/MMT and (b) PANI/MMT-rGO response to different gases at 2 ppm.
The sensor made of PANI alone when exposed to the 2 ppm concentration of HCN has a sensing response is 0.045%. The sensing response (0.05%) is slightly increased when the concentration of the HCN gas vapor is 4 ppm but the sensor becomes saturated after 6 ppm as shown in Fig. 5a. The sensor (PANI) is not fully recovering to the initial baseline. This may be due to the fact that the HCN molecules are permanently bonded to the polymer chain33.
Sensor response to different concentration of HCN gas by (a) PANI, (b) PANI/MMT and (c) PANI/MMT-rGO.
Both the sensors made up of PANI/MMT and PANI/MMT-rGO are exposed to 2 ppm, 4 ppm, 6 ppm, 8 ppm, and 10 ppm respectively. The sensing response of these sensors is calculated using Eq. (1) and shown in Table 2. The sensing response of the sensor becomes 3.5% (2 ppm) for PANI/MMT which has higher value as compared to the PANI alone (0.045%). The sensor response further increases as the concentration of the gas increase as shown in Fig. 5b. This increase in the sensor response (PANI/MMT) as compare to PANI sensors may be due to the increase in the binding sites provided by the MMT. The sensing response for PANI/MMT-rGO is 4.56% at 2 ppm, which is more than the PANI/MMT (3.5%) as shown in Fig. 5c. This increase in the sensor response is due to the increase in the surface area provided by rGO. In the case of graphene oxide, all the carbon atoms are available at the surface of the 2D sheet for binding with the exposed gas. Both the sensors PANI/MMT and PANI/MMT-rGO are recovering completely to the baseline. The response time of the sensor is defined as the time taken by the sensor to achieve 90% of the total sensor response. Figure 6a,b shows the response and recovery of PANI/MMT and PANI/MMT-rGO at different concentrations. The studies show that the PANI/MMT-rGO (29.5 s) sensor responded faster as compared to the PANI (34.5 s) and PANI/MMT (30.5 s) sensors. The sensor recovered automatically within 21 s for PANI/MMT and 25 s for PANI/MMT-rGO. Both the sensor (PANI/MMT and PANI/MMT-rGO) response and recovers less than a minute. In both the graph we observed that the response time of the sensor decreases as the concentrations of the HCN gas increase while the recovery time increases with the increases in concentrations. Figure 7 shows the graph of response and recovery time of all the sensors (PANI, PANI/MMT and PANI/MMT-rGO) exposed to the 2 ppm concentration of HCN gas.
(a) PANI/MMT and (b) PANI/MMT-rGO : Graph between response time, recovery time with the concentration.
Comaprision response time and recovery time of sensors when exposed to 2 ppm HCN gas.
The sensing response versus concentration graph is shown in Fig. 8a. From the graph, we have calculated the sensitivity of PANI/MMT and PANI/MMT-rGO by using the Eq. (3). The sensors have a sensitivity of 0.89 ppm−1 for PANI/MMT and 1.1174 ppm−1 in case of PANI/MMT-rGO respectively. Table 3 shows the present work with the previously reported works.
(a) Sensitivity Vs concentration and (b) Sensitivity Vs number of test run.
Both the sensors PANI/MMT and PANI/MMT-rGO are tested for 10 months by exposing 2 ppm concentration repeatedly, as shown in Fig. 8b. The sensing response of the sensor PANI/MMT remains constant for up to 6 months, but after which the sensing response becomes 3.25%. Similarly, the sensor PANI/MMT-rGO is stable up to 8 months and after that sensing response becomes 4.35%. Thus our sensors have a life span that varies from 6 to 8 months.
This decrease in the sensing response for both the sensors may be due to the decomposition of sensing material and the permanent binding of the HCN molecules to the sensing materials after repeated exposures. The FTIR studies of the sensing materials after 6 and 8 months show a minor peak at 1637 cm−1 in both PANI/MMT and PANI/MMT-rGO samples which are not present in the pristine PANI/MMT and PANI/MMT-rGO as shown in Fig. 9a,b.
FTIR of (a) PANI/MMT and (b) PANI/MMT-rGO.
The fabricated sensors PANI, PANI/MMT and PANI/MMT-rGO are exposed to HCN gas at different relative humidity (RH). We have observed that the sensing response (S%) of the sensor increases as the RH increases but decreases after 40% of the relative humidity. Figure 10 shows the graph between the sensing responses with the RH when exposed to a 2 ppm concentration of HCN. The sensor resistance is changed by the presence of humidity. In the above Fig. 10, we have observed an increase in the sensing response of the sensor as the RH% increases, this may be due to the decrease in electrical resistance of the sensing material. Inside the sensing material, the pores are previously filled with dry air are now filled with a water molecule. But after an RH% value of 40%, the sensing response of the sensors decreases. This is due to the absorption of more water by the sensing materials causing an increase in resistance. It also increases the separation between the polymer chains, thus causing hindering of the electron hopping process. A similar phenomenon is also reported by Cavallo et al.37.
Sensor responses to HCN (2 ppm) starting from different RH values.
The interaction between the PANI and HCN may occur in two different ways, (a) H or N sites of the HCN with PANI or (b) N or H sites of the PANI with the HCN. In the HCN compound, the H atom is lacked electrons charge due to the high electro-negativity of the –CN group. During the interaction between the PANI and HCN, the electronic charge is transferred to the HCN gas from the PANI. This transfer of electron is accepted by the H atom of the HCN gas from the N atom of the PANI forming H–N bonds38. Thus, it causes an increase in the resistance of the sensing material when exposed to the HCN gas vapour. HCN molecules also interact with the rGO. The interaction between the HCN and rGO also increases the electrical resistance of the sensors. This increase in the electrical resistance is attributed by the electron-donating property of HCN. When HCN come near to the rGO it increases the hole-type charge on it and shows the p-type semiconductor nature. The oxygen presence in the rGO binds with the hydrogen present in the HCN molecules35,39.
The polymer nanocomposite is synthesized and characterized with FTIR, XRD, TEM and SEM. The TEM micrograph of the graphene shows the formation of sheet structures. The SEM micrograph of PANI shows the formation of a nano-tube of diameter 50 nm and length 250 nm. The PANI is deposited over the entire surface of the MMT. In the case of the PANI/MMT-rGO, the rGO has encapsulated PANI/MMT. The peaks of the XRD pattern confirm the presence of MMT and rGO in the polymer composite. The sensor is exposed to different gases acetone, ammonia, benzene, hydrogen cyanide and xylene. The sensing material can detect HCN gas and give the highest sensing response. The sensing material PANI alone has a low sensing response of 0.05%. The sensing response of the sensing material increases as the MMT and rGO is added to the PANI. The PANI/MMT and PANI/MMT-rGo has the sensitivity of 0.89 ppm−1 and 1.1174 ppm−1 respectively. In both the sensors we observed that the sensing response of the sensor increases as the concentration of the gas exposed increases. The sensors recovered automatically within 21 s (PANI/MMT) and 25 s (PANI/MMT-rGO). The sensor’s performance decreases after 6 months and 8 months.
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Patnaik, P. A Comprehensive Guide to the Hazardous Properties of Chemical Substance, Third Edition, Cyanides, Inorganic 317–335 (Wiley, 2006).
Book  Google Scholar 
Ballantyne, B. C. & Hall, A. H. Cyanides: Chemical Warfare Agents and Potential Terrorist Threats 495–542 (Wiley, 2007).
Book  Google Scholar 
Chaturvedi, A. K., Sanders, D. C., Endecott, B. R. & Ritter, R. M. Exposures to carbon monoxide, hydrogen cyanide and their mixtures: Interrelationship between gas exposure concentration, time to incapacitation, carboxyhemoglobin and blood cyanide in rats. J. Appl. Toxicol. 15, 357–363 (1995).
Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 
Porter, T. L. et al. A solid-state sensor platform for the detection of hydrogen cyanide gas. Sens. Actuators B 123(1), 313–317 (2007).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Pandey, S., Goswami, G. K. & Nanda, K. K. Nanocomposite based flexible ultrasensitive resistive gas sensor for chemical reactions studies. Sci. Rep. 3(1), 1–6 (2013).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Zhang, D. et al. Facile fabrication of high-performance QCM humidity sensor based on layer-by-layer self-assembled polyaniline/graphene oxide nanocomposite film. Sens. Actuators B 255, 1869–1877 (2018).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Liu, Y. et al. Highly permeable WO3/CuWO4 heterostructure with 3D hierarchical porous structure for high-sensitive room-temperature visible-light driven gas sensor. Sens. Actuators B 365, 131926 (2022).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Wang, X. et al. In situ polymerized polyaniline/MXene (V2C) as building blocks of supercapacitor and ammonia sensor self-powered by electromagnetic-triboelectric hybrid generator. Nano Energy 88, 106242 (2021).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Zhang, D., Tong, J. & Xia, B. Humidity-sensing properties of chemically reduced graphene oxide/polymer nanocomposite film sensor based on layer-by-layer nano self-assembly. Sens. Actuators B 197, 66–72 (2014).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Zhang, D., Wu, W. & Zong, X. Metal-organic frameworks-derived zinc oxide nanopolyhedra/S, N: Graphene quantum dots/polyaniline ternary nanohybrid for high-performance acetone sensing. Sens. Actuators B 288, 232–242 (2019).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Fratoddi, I., Venditti, I., Cametti, C. & Russo, M. V. Chemiresistive polyaniline-based gas sensors: A mini review. Sens. Actuators B 220, 534–548 (2015).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Su, S. J. & Kuramoto, N. Processable polyaniline–titanium dioxide nanocomposites: Effect of titanium dioxide on the conductivity. Synth. Met. 114(2), 147–153 (2000).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Sui, X., Chu, Y., Xing, S. & Liu, C. Synthesis of PANI/AgCl, PANI/BaSO4 and PANI/TiO2 nanocomposites in CTAB/hexanol/water reverse micelle. Mater. Lett. 58(7–8), 1255–1259 (2004).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Houdayer, A., Schneider, R., Billaud, D., Ghanbaja, J. & Lambert, J. New polyaniline/Ni (0) nanocomposites: Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of their catalytic activity in Heck couplings. Synth. Met. 151(2), 165–174 (2005).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Yang, M., He, J., Hu, X., Yan, C. & Cheng, Z. CuO nanostructures as quartz crystal microbalance sensing layers for detection of trace hydrogen cyanide gas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45(14), 6088–6094 (2011).
Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 
Yang, M. et al. Copper oxide nanoparticle sensors for hydrogen cyanide detection: Unprecedented selectivity and sensitivity. Sens. Actuators B 155(2), 692–698 (2011).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Hummers, W. S. Jr. & Offeman, R. E. Preparation of graphitic oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80(6), 1339–1339 (1958).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Tiwari, D. C., Atri, P. & Sharma, R. Sensitive detection of ammonia by reduced graphene oxide/polypyrrole nanocomposites. Synth. Met. 203, 228–234 (2015).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Atri, P., Tiwari, D. C. & Sharma, R. Synthesis of reduced graphene oxide nanoscrolls embedded in polypyrrole matrix for supercapacitor applications. Synth. Met. 227, 21–28 (2017).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Dipak, P., Tiwari, D. C., Dwivedi, S. K., Shami, T. C. & Dwivedi, P. K. Synthesis and characterization polymer nanocomposite of PANI/TiO2 (np)-Fe+3 for microwave application. J. Mater. Sci. 29(8), 6439–6464 (2018).
CAS  Google Scholar 
Pande, S. et al. Synthesis, characterization and studies of PANI-MMT nanocomposite. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2(4), 90–98 (2012).
Article  Google Scholar 
Kalaivasan, N. & Shafi, S. S. Enhancement of corrosion protection effect in mechanochemically synthesized Polyaniline/MMT clay nanocomposites. Arab. J. Chem. 10, S127–S133 (2017).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Vuong, N. M., Kim, D. & Kim, H. Porous Au-embedded WO3 nanowire structure for efficient detection of CH4 and H2S. Sci. Rep. 5, 11040 (2015).
Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 
Wang, X. et al. Functionalized nanoporous TiO2 fibers on quartz crystal microbalance platform for formaldehyde sensor. Sens. Actuators B 171, 658–665 (2012).
Article  Google Scholar 
Li, X., Chang, Y. & Long, Y. Influence of Sn doping on ZnO sensing properties for ethanol and acetone. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 32(4), 817–821 (2012).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Mir, M. A. et al. Fabrication of polyaniline/zeolite composites and their response towards nitrogen dioxide. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 233, 53–61 (2016).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Patil, U. V. et al. Room temperature ammonia sensor based on copper nanoparticle intercalated polyaniline nanocomposite thin films. Appl. Surf. Sci. 339, 69–74 (2015).
Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 
Varadwaj, G. B. B., Rana, S., Parida, K. & Nayak, B. B. A multi-functionalized montmorillonite for co-operative catalysis in one-pot Henry reaction and water pollution remediation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2(20), 7526–7534 (2014).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Madurai, S. L., Joseph, S. W., Mandal, A. B., Tsibouklis, J. & Reddy, B. S. Intestine-specific, oral delivery of captopril/montmorillonite: Formulation and release kinetics. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 6(1), 1–8 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Park, S. et al. Colloidal suspensions of highly reduced graphene oxide in a wide variety of organic solvents. Nano Lett. 9(4), 1593–1597 (2009).
Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 
Dikin, D. A. et al. Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide paper. Nature 448(7152), 457–460 (2007).
Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 
Tiwari, D. C., Dwivedi, S. K., Dipak, P. & Chandel, T. PEDOT: PSS: rGO nanocomposite as a hole transport layer (HTLs) for P3HT: PCBM based organic solar cells. In AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1953, No. 1 100065 (AIP Publishing LLC, 2018).
Singh, V. V. et al. Detection of chemical warfare agent Nitrogen Mustard-1 based on conducting polymer phthalocyanine nanorod modified electrode. Synth. Met. 159, 19–20 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar 
Greenawald, L. A. et al. Development of a cobinamide-based end-of-service-life indicator for detection of hydrogen cyanide gas. Sens. Actuators B 221, 379–385 (2015).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Taher, A., Mahrokh, S., Younes, H. & Sang, W. J. A new hydrogen cyanide chemiresistor gas sensor based on graphene quantum dots. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2016.1196680 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 
Lu, Y. S. et al. Remote detection of HCN, HF, and nerve agent vapors based on self-referencing, dye-impregnated porous silicon photonic crystals. ACS Sens. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.0c01931 (2020).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
Cavallo, P. et al. Understanding the sensing mechanism of polyaniline resistive sensors. Effect of humidity on sensing of organic volatiles. Sens. Actuators B 210, 574–580 (2015).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Hirooka, M. & Doi, T. Structural regulation of conductive polymers and effect of dopants. Synth. Met. 17(1–3), 209–214 (1987).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Zhao, M., Yang, F., Xue, Y., Xiao, D. & Guo, Y. Adsorption of HCN on reduced graphene oxides: A first– principles study. J. Mol. Model 20, 2214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-014-2214-8 (2014).
Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 
Download references
The authors are thankful to School of Studies in Physics, Jiwaji University, Gwalior for providing the experimental facilities. The authors acknowledge to Central Instrumentation Facility Laboratory (CIFL), Jiwaji University, Gwalior for TEM, XRD and FTIR studies and IIT, Roorkee for SEM analysis.
School of Studies in Physics, Jiwaji University, Gwalior, India
Aparna Singh, Pukhrambam Dipak, Asif Iqbal, Anuradha Samadhiya, Shailendra Kumar Dwivedi, Dinesh Chandra Tiwari & Rajendra Kumar Tiwari
Vikrant University, Gwalior, India
Aparna Singh
Department of Physics, School of Sciences, ITM University, Gwalior, India
Pukhrambam Dipak
Applied Science and Humanities Department, IPS Group of Colleges, Gwalior, India
Shailendra Kumar Dwivedi
DMSRDE, Kanpur, India
Kailash Nath Pandey
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
P.D. fabrication of sensor, analysis the data, paper writing and Project administration. A.S. and A.I. were help in synthesis of the sensing materials. A.S. synthesis the required HCN. S.K.D. analysis the data. D.C.T. design the experiment and Project administration. R.K.T. and K.N.P. review & editing.
Correspondence to Pukhrambam Dipak or Dinesh Chandra Tiwari.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Reprints and Permissions
Singh, A., Dipak, P., Iqbal, A. et al. Fast response and recovery polyaniline montmorillonite reduce graphene oxide polymer nanocomposite material for detection of hydrogen cyanide gas. Sci Rep 13, 8074 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32151-0
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32151-0
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
Scientific Reports (Sci Rep) ISSN 2045-2322 (online)
© 2023 Springer Nature Limited
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.